↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian Argumentation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Why Are We Convinced by the Ad Hominem Argument?: Bayesian Source Reliability and Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Why Are We Convinced by the Ad Hominem Argument?: Bayesian Source Reliability and Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
Chapter number 3
Book title
Bayesian Argumentation
Published by
Springer, Dordrecht, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5357-0_3
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-075356-3, 978-9-40-075357-0
Authors

Mike Oaksford, Ulrike Hahn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 33%
Unspecified 1 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%