You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Whole Cell Panning with Phage Display
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 5 |
Book title |
Synthetic Antibodies
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6857-2_5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6855-8, 978-1-4939-6857-2
|
Authors |
Yvonne Stark, Sophie Venet, Annika Schmid, Stark, Yvonne, Venet, Sophie, Schmid, Annika |
Editors |
Thomas Tiller |
Abstract |
Phage display has emerged as one of the leading technologies for the selection of highly specific monoclonal antibodies, offering a number of advantages over traditional methods of antibody generation. While there are various possibilities to conduct phage display (e.g., solution panning, solid-phase panning), whole cell panning is an elegant way to present membrane embedded target antigens in their natural environment and conformation to antibody-bearing phages. Here, a whole cell panning procedure using a Fab-based antibody library including primary cell based screening for selectivity is described. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,335
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,756
of 310,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#32
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.