Chapter title |
A Review of the Evidence to Support Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Prevention and Management of Venous Disease
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 128 |
Book title |
Thrombosis and Embolism: from Research to Clinical Practice
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/5584_2016_128 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-922107-6, 978-3-31-922108-3
|
Authors |
K. J. Williams, R. Ravikumar, A. S. Gaweesh, H. M. Moore, A. D. Lifsitz, T. R. A. Lane, J. Shalhoub, A. Babber, A. H. Davies, Williams, K. J., Ravikumar, R., Gaweesh, A. S., Moore, H. M., Lifsitz, A. D., Lane, T. R. A., Shalhoub, J., Babber, A., Davies, A. H. |
Editors |
Md. Shahidul Islam |
Abstract |
The prevention and management of venous disease is a therapeutic challenge. Movement of blood through the venous system is augmented by the action of muscles on the deep veins, and can be achieved through the application of electrical current. The efficacy of currently available clinical devices for this purpose is unknown, and is investigated here. A literature search of the EMBASE and Medline databases was performed, and studies were included if they were full text articles, written in english, pertaining to venous disease and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). NMES devices increase venous haemodynamic parameters such as peak velocity and volume flow. Studies report them to be non-inferior to intermittent pneumatic compression. They are effective in the prevention of venous thromboembolism, though inferior to low molecular weight heparin. NMES can reduce symptoms of chronic venous disease. NMES is an important tool in the prevention and management of venous disease, and avoids the significant risks associated with heparin administration. Data explored here is heterogenous in device, protocol, and reported end-points, therefore should be interpreted with care. Long term effects of treatment with NMES have not been explored. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 21% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |