↓ Skip to main content

Thrombosis and Embolism: from Research to Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Thrombosis and Embolism: from Research to Clinical Practice'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 100 The Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 101 Thromboembolic Prophylaxis for Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 102 The Use of Surgical Care Improvement Projects in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 103 The Diagnosis and Management of Early Deep Vein Thrombosis
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 104 Symptomatology, Clinical Presentation and Basic Work up in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 105 Radionuclide Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 106 Thrombolytic Therapy by Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Pulmonary Embolism
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 107 Surgical Treatment of Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 108 The Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation in Patients with Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 109 Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 110 Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Regulatory Mechanisms and Emerging Directions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 111 The Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 112 The Role of New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Cancer Patients
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 113 Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Children and Adolescents
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 114 Deep Vein Thrombosis in Intensive Care
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 115 Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 116 Endovascular Treatment of Thrombosis and Embolism
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 117 Venous Thromboembolism in Brain Tumor Patients
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 118 Portal Vein Thrombosis: Recent Advance
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 119 Portal Vein Thrombosis After Splenic and Pancreatic Surgery
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 120 Genetic Risk Factors in Venous Thromboembolism
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 121 Venous and Arterial Thrombosis: Is There a Link?
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 122 Thrombosis and von Willebrand Factor
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 123 Role of P2Y12 Receptor in Thrombosis
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 124 Proton Pump Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Disease: Drug Interactions with Antiplatelet Drugs
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 125 The Risk of Thromboembolism in Users of Antidepressants and Antipsychotics
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 126 Post Thrombotic Syndrome
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 128 A Review of the Evidence to Support Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Prevention and Management of Venous Disease
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 129 Non-Invasive Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 130 Medico-Legal Aspects of Pulmonary Thromboembolism
Attention for Chapter 116: Endovascular Treatment of Thrombosis and Embolism
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Endovascular Treatment of Thrombosis and Embolism
Chapter number 116
Book title
Thrombosis and Embolism: from Research to Clinical Practice
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_116
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922107-6, 978-3-31-922108-3
Authors

Ahmet Yigit Goktay, Cagin Senturk

Editors

Md. Shahidul Islam

Abstract

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common disorder with a significant mortality rate. Successful endovascular treatment of acute DVT is most likely to be achieved in patients with recently formed thrombus, (<10-14 days) with acute iliofemoral DVT. Endovascular treatment options include: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT), percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy (PAT), vena cava filter protection, venous balloon dilatation and venous stent implantation. Current practice shows strong clinical tendency for the use of PCDT with or without other endovascular methods and an individualized approach for each DVT patient. PMT has not received general acceptance because of the associated risk of PE and damage to venous valves caused by thrombectomy devices. PAT is most commonly used as an adjunctive endovascular technique like balloon maceration to fragment thrombus, balloon angioplasty, stent implantation and vena cava filter placement. Interventional endovascular therapies for DVT have the potential to provide PE protection and prevention of PTS. Patient centered individualized approach for endovascular DVT treatment is recommended to optimize the ideal clinical result.Acute stroke is the leading cause of death for people above the age of 60 and the fifth leading cause in people aged 15-59. Mortality during the first 30 days of ischemic stroke is 20 % and 30 % of survivors will remain permanently disabled. Acute stroke patients within the therapeutic window must receive IVrtPA unless there is a contraindication. In case of contraindication to IVrtPA or for patients out of the therapeutic window for thrombolytics, standart of care is the intraarterial treatment. Patients have to be transferred to a comprehensive stroke center with capacity of dedicated neurovascular imaging and interventional neuroradiology. Noncontrast head CT that is used to rule out hemorrhage is followed by imaging studies dedicated to show if there is reasonable penumbra to save. Intraarterial thrombolysis has the main advantage of extended therapy window, earlier and more efficient recanalization and less risk of hemorrhage due to lower doses of thrombolytics. Mechanical thrombectomy has several advantages over IV/IA fibrinolysis including faster recanalization and less risk of hemorrhage especially in large artery occlusions. ASA guidelines recommend choosing stent retrievers over other devices for mechanical thrombectomy. Better recanalization rates and less infarct volume after mechanical thrombectomy result in higher numbers of functionally independent patients compared with other treatments. Two landmark studies that were published recently, SWIFT PRIME and MR CLEAN, showed that IA treatment especially with the new stent retrievers lead to a significant increase in functional recovery and independence in daily life after an acute stroke.Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis (CVST) comprises nearly 0.5-1 % of all stroke cases. CVST causes different neurological deficits depending on the sinus/cortical vein involved. CVST may cause death and dependency in 13.4 % of patients. CT/CT venography and MR/MR venography can be effectively used to diagnose and to follow up CVT cases. Anticoagulation with heparin is the most widely accepted therapy to prevent the expansion of the thrombus. Patients deteriorating despite heparinization and patients presenting with very severe neurological deficits must receive endovascular treatment. Endovascular methods include intrasinus infusion of thrombolytics or heparin, balloon angioplasty, mechanical thrombectomy or a combination of different techniques. There is a higher rate or recanalization with endovascular methods compared to other medical therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 42 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 56 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,406,219
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,981
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,347
of 322,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#85
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.