Comparative Genomics
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Practical Approach to Using the Genomic Standards Consortium MIxS Reporting Standard for Comparative Genomics and Metagenomics.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 20 |
| Book title |
Comparative Genomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3838-5_20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163837-8, 978-1-07-163838-5
|
| Authors |
Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh, Christopher J Mungall, Mark Andrew Miller, Montana Smith, Sujay Sanjeev Patil, Julia M Kelliher, Leah Y D Johnson, Francisca E Rodriguez, Patrick S G Chain, Bin Hu, Michael B Thornton, Lee Ann McCue, Alice Carolyn McHardy, Nomi L Harris, T B K Reddy, Supratim Mukherjee, Christopher I Hunter, Ramona Walls, Lynn M Schriml, Eloe-Fadrosh, Emiley A., Mungall, Christopher J., Miller, Mark Andrew, Smith, Montana, Patil, Sujay Sanjeev, Kelliher, Julia M., Johnson, Leah Y. D., Rodriguez, Francisca E., Chain, Patrick S. G., Hu, Bin, Thornton, Michael B., McCue, Lee Ann, McHardy, Alice Carolyn, Harris, Nomi L., Reddy, T. B. K., Mukherjee, Supratim, Hunter, Christopher I., Walls, Ramona, Schriml, Lynn M. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,517,408
of 26,078,244 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,301
of 14,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,839
of 368,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#25
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,078,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,520 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.