↓ Skip to main content

Oat

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Oat'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Oat
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Oat Doubled Haploids Following Maize Pollination
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Wide Hybridization Between Oat and Pearl Millet
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Protocol for Producing Synthetic Polyploid Oats
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Manipulation of Oat Protoplasts for Transient Expression Assays
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Oat Anther Culture and Use of DH-Lines for Genetic Mapping
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Leaf Base Segments
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Chromatographic Methods to Evaluate Nutritional Quality in Oat
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Determination of T-2 and HT-2 Toxins in Oats and Oat-Based Breakfast Cereals by Liquid-Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Multiplex Dipstick Immunoassay for Semiquantitative Determination of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Oat
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Microarray-Based Immunoassay for Parallel Quantification of Multiple Mycotoxins in Oat
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 M13-Tailed Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers in Studies of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Common Oat Germplasm
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Genotyping-by-Sequencing and Its Application to Oat Genomic Research
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Genome-Wide Association Analysis Using R
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Polyploid Species
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation of Oat (Avena sativa L.) Total Proteins and Their Prolamin Fractions for 2D Electrophoresis
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 2-DE Separation and Identification of Oat (Avena sativa L.) Proteins and Their Prolamin Fractions
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Selected Bioinformatic Tools and MS (MALDI-TOF, PMF) Techniques Used in the Strategy for the Identification of Oat Proteins After 2-DE
Attention for Chapter 15: De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Polyploid Species
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Polyploid Species
Chapter number 15
Book title
Oat
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6682-0_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6680-6, 978-1-4939-6682-0
Authors

Gutierrez-Gonzalez, Juan J., Garvin, David F., Juan J. Gutierrez-Gonzalez, David F. Garvin

Editors

Sebastian Gasparis

Abstract

In the absence of a reference genome, the ultimate goal of a de novo transcriptome assembly is to accurately and comprehensively reconstruct the set of messenger RNA transcripts represented in the sample. Non-reference assembly of the transcriptome of polyploid species poses a particular challenge because of the presence of homeologs that are difficult to disentangle at the sequence level. This is especially true for hexaploid oats, which have three highly similar subgenomes, two of which are thought to be nearly identical. Under these circumstances, most software packages and established pipelines encounter difficulties in rendering an accurate transcriptome because they are typically developed, refined, and tested for diploid organisms. We present a protocol for transcriptome assembly in oats that can be extended both to other polyploids and species with highly duplicated genomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 31%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,324,882
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,213
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,878
of 420,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#378
of 1,155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.