You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Functional Metagenomics to Study Antibiotic Resistance.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 21 |
| Book title |
Antibiotics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2855-3_21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162854-6, 978-1-07-162855-3
|
| Authors |
Mahmud, Bejan, Boolchandani, Manish, Patel, Sanket, Dantas, Gautam |
| Abstract |
The construction and screening of metagenomic expression libraries have a great potential to identify novel genes with desired functions. Here, we describe metagenomic library preparation from fecal DNA, screening of libraries for antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), massively parallel DNA sequencing of the enriched DNA fragments, and a computational pipeline for high-throughput assembly and annotation of functionally selected DNA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,934,685
of 25,248,299 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,044
of 14,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,581
of 475,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#56
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,248,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.