You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Targeted Nuclease Approaches for Mapping Native R-Loops
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 25 |
Book title |
R-Loops
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2477-7_25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162476-0, 978-1-07-162477-7
|
Authors |
Wulfridge, Phillip, Yan, Qingqing, Sarma, Kavitha, Phillip Wulfridge, Qingqing Yan, Kavitha Sarma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#13,768,924
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,420
of 13,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,853
of 404,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#58
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.