↓ Skip to main content

Axon Regeneration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Analysis of Axonal Regrowth and Dendritic Remodeling After Optic Nerve Crush in Adult Zebrafish.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analysis of Axonal Regrowth and Dendritic Remodeling After Optic Nerve Crush in Adult Zebrafish.
Book title
Axon Regeneration
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3012-9_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163011-2, 978-1-07-163012-9
Authors

Beckers, An, Bergmans, Steven, Van Dyck, Annelies, Moons, Lieve

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases and central nervous system (CNS) injuries are frequently characterized by axonal damage, as well as dendritic pathology. In contrast to mammals, adult zebrafish show a robust regeneration capacity after CNS injury and form the ideal model organism to further unravel the underlying mechanisms for both axonal and dendritic regrowth upon CNS damage. Here, we first describe an optic nerve crush injury model in adult zebrafish, an injury paradigm that inflicts de- and regeneration of the axons of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), but also triggers RGC dendrite disintegration and subsequent recovery in a stereotyped and timed process. Next, we outline protocols for quantifying axonal regeneration and synaptic recovery in the brain, using retro- and anterograde tracing experiments and an immunofluorescent staining for presynaptic compartments, respectively. Finally, methods to analyze RGC dendrite retraction and subsequent regrowth in the retina are delineated, using morphological measurements and immunofluorescent staining for dendritic and synaptic markers.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,323,720
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,147
of 13,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,829
of 438,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#23
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.