You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Embryoid Bodies-Based Multilineage Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Grown on Feeder-Free Conditions.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 440 |
| Book title |
Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/7651_2021_440 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162436-4, 978-1-07-162437-1
|
| Authors |
Isaja, Luciana, Ferriol-Laffouillere, Sofía Luján, Mucci, Sofía, Rodríguez-Varela, María Soledad, Romorini, Leonardo |
| Abstract |
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can differentiate into any cell lineage (pluripotency potential) derived from the three germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. Pluripotency is usually demonstrated in vitro by spontaneous differentiation of hESCs grown on a monolayer of feeder-cells using an embryoid bodies (EBs)-based method. However, currently hESCs are grown mostly using fully defined media in the absence of a feeder layer. Here we describe a EBs-based protocol that allows multilineage differentiation of hESCs and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) grown on feeder-free conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,093
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,271
of 434,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#146
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.