You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Grafting with Arabidopsis thaliana.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 2 |
Book title |
Plant Hormones
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6469-7_2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6467-3, 978-1-4939-6469-7
|
Authors |
Charles W. Melnyk, Melnyk, Charles W, Melnyk, Charles W. |
Editors |
Jürgen Kleine-Vehn, Michael Sauer |
Abstract |
Generating chimeric organisms is an invaluable way to study cell-to-cell movement and non-cell-autonomous actions of molecules. Plant grafting is an ancient method of generating chimeric organisms and recently has been used to study the movement of hormones, proteins, and RNAs. Here, I describe a simple and efficient way to graft Arabidopsis thaliana at the seedling stage to generate plants with roots and shoots of different genotypes. Using this protocol, success rates of over 80 % with up to 80 grafts assembled per hour can be achieved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 27% |
Researcher | 16 | 15% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 45% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 26% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#18,482,034
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,927
of 13,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,539
of 420,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#691
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.