↓ Skip to main content

Difference Gel Electrophoresis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Difference Gel Electrophoresis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and 2D-DIGE
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Top-Down Proteomics and Comparative 2D-DIGE Analysis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 DIGE Analysis Software and Protein Identification Approaches
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Native DIGE for Quantitative and Functional Analysis of Protein Interactomes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Comparative Two-Dimensional Fluorescence Gel Electrophoresis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 DIGE-Based Phosphoproteomic Analysis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 DIGE-Based Biomarker Discovery in Blood Cancers
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 DIGE Saturation Labeling for Scarce Amounts of Protein from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tissue
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 DIGE Analysis of ProteoMiner™ Fractionated Serum/Plasma Samples
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Comparative 3-Sample 2D-DIGE Analysis of Skeletal Muscles
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Proteomic Identification of Saliva Proteins as Noninvasive Diagnostic Biomarkers
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Analysis of the Saliva Proteome Using 2D-DIGE
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 DIGE Analysis of Clinical Specimens
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 DIGE Analysis of Animal Tissues
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 2D-DIGE Proteomic Analysis of Mouse Liver Within 1 Week
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 2D-DIGE Analysis of Liver Disease in Mice
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Two-Dye Versus Three-Dye DIGE for Comparative Testis Tissue Proteomic Analysis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Two-CyDye-Based 2D-DIGE Analysis of Aged Human Muscle Biopsy Specimens
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Identification of Subproteomic Markers for Skeletal Muscle Profiling
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 DIGE Analysis of Fish Tissues
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Sample Preparation and Protein Determination for 2D-DIGE Proteomics
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Protein Digestion for 2D-DIGE Analysis
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Subcellular Fractionation for DIGE-Based Proteomics
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 DIGE Analysis of Immunodepleted Plasma
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Bioinformatic Analysis of the Subproteomic Profile of Cardiomyopathic Tissue
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Elucidating Cellular Metabolism and Protein Difference Data from DIGE Proteomics Experiments Using Enzyme Assays
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Enzyme Assay Methods to Validate DIGE Proteomics Data
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Immunoblot Analysis of DIGE-Based Proteomics
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Verification of Protein Changes Determined by 2D-DIGE Based Proteomics Using Immunofluorescence Microscopy
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Histological and Histochemical Microscopy Used to Verify 2D-DIGE Pathoproteomics
Attention for Chapter 8: DIGE-Based Biomarker Discovery in Blood Cancers
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
DIGE-Based Biomarker Discovery in Blood Cancers
Chapter number 8
Book title
Difference Gel Electrophoresis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, November 2022
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-2831-7_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162830-0, 978-1-07-162831-7
Authors

Dunphy, Katie, Dowling, Paul

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,552,610
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,417
of 13,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,152
of 399,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#97
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.