You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Difference Gel Electrophoresis
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2831-7 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-07-162830-0, 978-1-07-162831-7
|
| Editors |
Ohlendieck, Kay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,640,751
of 23,900,102 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,159
of 13,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,436
of 449,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#118
of 593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,900,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.