You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
An Evolutionary Algorithm to Learn SPARQL Queries for Source-Target-Pairs
Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management
Lecture notes in computer science, November 2016
Jörn Hees, Rouven Bauer, Joachim Folz, Damian Borth, Andreas Dengel, Hees, Jörn, Bauer, Rouven, Folz, Joachim, Borth, Damian, Dengel, Andreas
Eva Blomqvist, Paolo Ciancarini, Francesco Poggi, Fabio Vitali
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||11||85%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||9%|
|Student > Master||1||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,752,589 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
of 8,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 313,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,752,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.