↓ Skip to main content

Enhancer RNAs

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 14: Enhancer RNAs
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Enhancer RNAs
Chapter number 14
Book title
Enhancer RNAs
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-4035-6_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-4033-2, 978-1-4939-4035-6
Authors

Djebali, Sarah, Wucher, Valentin, Foissac, Sylvain, Hitte, Christophe, Corre, Evan, Derrien, Thomas, Sarah Djebali Ph.D., Valentin Wucher, Sylvain Foissac, Christophe Hitte, Evan Corre, Thomas Derrien Ph.D., Erwan Corre, Sarah Djebali, Thomas Derrien

Editors

Ulf Andersson Ørom

Abstract

The development of High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) for RNA profiling (RNA-seq) has shed light on the diversity of transcriptomes. While RNA-seq is becoming a de facto standard for monitoring the population of expressed transcripts in a given condition at a specific time, processing the huge amount of data it generates requires dedicated bioinformatics programs. Here, we describe a standard bioinformatics protocol using state-of-the-art tools, the STAR mapper to align reads onto a reference genome, Cufflinks to reconstruct the transcriptome, and RSEM to quantify expression levels of genes and transcripts. We present the workflow using human transcriptome sequencing data from two biological replicates of the K562 cell line produced as part of the ENCODE3 project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 27%
Computer Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,181,495
of 24,960,237 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#614
of 14,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,243
of 432,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#83
of 1,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,960,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.