↓ Skip to main content

Plant Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Bioinformatics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Using GenBank.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the Manually Annotated Section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: How to Use the Entry View.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 KEGG Bioinformatics Resource for Plant Genomics and Metabolomics.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Plant Bioinformatics
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Plant Ontology: A Tool for Plant Genomics.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Ensembl Plants: Integrating Tools for Visualizing, Mining, and Analyzing Plant Genomics Data.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Gramene: A Resource for Comparative Analysis of Plants Genomes and Pathways.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 PGSB/MIPS Plant Genome Information Resources and Concepts for the Analysis of Complex Grass Genomes.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 MaizeGDB: The Maize Genetics and Genomics Database.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 WheatGenome.info: A Resource for Wheat Genomics Resource.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 User Guidelines for the Brassica Database: BRAD.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 TAG Sequence Identification of Genomic Regions Using TAGdb.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Short Read Alignment Using SOAP2.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Tablet: Visualizing Next-Generation Sequence Assemblies and Mappings.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Analysis of Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Skim-Based Genotyping by Sequencing Using a Double Haploid Population to Call SNPs, Infer Gene Conversions, and Improve Genome Assemblies.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Finding and Characterizing Repeats in Plant Genomes.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Analysis of RNA-Seq Data Using TopHat and Cufflinks.
Attention for Chapter 1: Using GenBank.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using GenBank.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Plant Bioinformatics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3166-8, 978-1-4939-3167-5
Authors

Eric W. Sayers, Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi, Sayers, Eric W., Karsch-Mizrachi, Ilene

Editors

David Edwards

Abstract

GenBank(®) is a comprehensive database of publicly available DNA sequences for 300,000 named organisms, more than 110,000 within the embryophyta, obtained through submissions from individual laboratories and batch submissions from large-scale sequencing projects. Daily data exchange with the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) in Europe and the DNA Data Bank of Japan ensures worldwide coverage. GenBank is accessible through the NCBI Entrez retrieval system that integrates data from the major DNA and protein sequence databases with taxonomy, genome, mapping, protein structure and domain information, as well as the biomedical journal literature in PubMed. BLAST provides sequence similarity searches of GenBank and other sequence databases. Complete bimonthly releases and daily updates of the GenBank database are available by FTP. GenBank usage scenarios ranging from local analyses of the data available via FTP to online analyses supported by the NCBI web-based tools are discussed. To access GenBank and its related retrieval and analysis services, go to the NCBI home page at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 33%
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 52%
Computer Science 4 10%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,487,737
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,327
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,046
of 393,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#268
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.