You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
3D-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization of Intact, Anaerobic Biofilm.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Engineering and Analyzing Multicellular Systems
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-0553-9, 978-1-4939-0554-6
|
| Authors |
Brileya KA, Camilleri LB, Fields MW, Kristen A. Brileya, Laura B. Camilleri, Matthew W. Fields, Brileya, Kristen A., Camilleri, Laura B., Fields, Matthew W. |
| Editors |
Lianhong Sun, Wenying Shou |
| Abstract |
FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) is a valuable technique to visualize and quantify localization of different microbial species within biofilms. Biofilm conformation can be altered during typical sample preparation for FISH, which can impact observations in multispecies biofilms, including the relative positions of cells. Here, we describe methods to preserve 3-D structure during FISH for visualization of an anaerobic coculture biofilm of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough and Methanococcus maripaludis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,961,244
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,168
of 13,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,089
of 227,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#53
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.