↓ Skip to main content

Mouse Models for Drug Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mouse Models for Drug Discovery'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Genetically Defined Strains in Drug Development and Toxicity Testing.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Human FcRn Transgenic Mice for Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Therapeutic Antibodies.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Humanized Mouse Model to Study Human Albumin and Albumin Conjugates Pharmacokinetics.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bridging Mice to Men: Using HLA Transgenic Mice to Enhance the Future Prediction and Prevention of Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes in Humans.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Mouse Models of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Drug Discovery.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Cholesterol Absorption and Metabolism.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Skin Diseases in Laboratory Mice: Approaches to Drug Target Identification and Efficacy Screening.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Mouse Model in Translational Research.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Murine Model for Colitis-Associated Cancer of the Colon.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Repetitive Behavioral Assessments for Compound Screening in Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorders.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
Attention for Chapter 12: Skin Diseases in Laboratory Mice: Approaches to Drug Target Identification and Efficacy Screening.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Skin Diseases in Laboratory Mice: Approaches to Drug Target Identification and Efficacy Screening.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3661-8_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3659-5, 978-1-4939-3661-8
Authors

John P. Sundberg D.V.M., Ph.D., Kathleen A. Silva, Lloyd E. King Jr, C. Herbert Pratt, John P. Sundberg, Lloyd E. KingJr, Lloyd E. King, Jr, Lloyd E. King

Editors

Gabriele Proetzel, Michael V. Wiles

Abstract

A large variety of mouse models for human skin, hair, and nail diseases are readily available from investigators and vendors worldwide. Mouse skin is a simple organ to observe lesions and their response to therapy, but identifying and monitoring the progress of treatments of mouse skin diseases can still be challenging. This chapter provides an overview on how to use the laboratory mouse as a preclinical tool to evaluate efficacy of new compounds or test potential new uses for compounds approved for use for treating an unrelated disease. Basic approaches to handling mice, applying compounds, and quantifying effects of the treatment are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,380,722
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,350
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,976
of 393,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#545
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.