You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Preparation of Hierarchical Porous Silicalite-1 Encapsulated Ag NPs and Its Catalytic Performance for 4-Nitrophenol Reduction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Discover Nano, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s11671-018-2579-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bin Wang, Haojiang Wang, Fengwei Zhang, Tijian Sun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 5 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#228
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,424
of 342,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.