You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/b95935 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-021305-5, 978-3-54-024721-0
|
| Authors |
Michel Wermelinger, Tiziana Margaria-Steffen |
| Editors |
Wermelinger, Michel, Margaria-Steffen, Tiziana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,025,408
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,295
of 8,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,043
of 133,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#40
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.