↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic Alterations in Oncogenesis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: DNA hypomethylation and activation of germline-specific genes in cancer.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
DNA hypomethylation and activation of germline-specific genes in cancer.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Epigenetic Alterations in Oncogenesis
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9967-2_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4419-9966-5, 978-1-4419-9967-2
Authors

De Smet C, Loriot A, Charles De Smet, Axelle Loriot, De Smet, Charles, Loriot, Axelle

Abstract

DNA methylation, occurring at cytosines in CpG dinucleotides, is a potent mechanism of transcriptional repression. Proper genomic methylation -patterns become profoundly altered in cancer cells: both gains (hypermethylation) and losses (hypomethylation) of methylated sites are observed. Although DNA hypomethylation is detected in a vast majority of human tumors and affects many genomic regions, its role in tumor biology remains elusive. Surprisingly, DNA hypomethylation in cancer was found to cause the aberrant activation of only a limited group of genes. Most of these are normally expressed exclusively in germline cells and were grouped under the term "cancer-germline" (CG) genes. CG genes represent unique examples of genes that rely primarily on DNA methylation for their tissue-specific expression. They are also being exploited to uncover the mechanisms that lead to DNA hypomethylation in tumors. Moreover, as CG genes encode tumor-specific antigens, their activation in cancer highlights a direct link between epigenetic alterations and tumor immunity. As a result, clinical trials combining epigenetic drugs with anti-CG antigen vaccines are being considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2012.
All research outputs
#13,670,614
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,954
of 4,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,796
of 168,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.