↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic Alterations in Oncogenesis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Epigenetic Regulation of miRNAs in Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Epigenetic Regulation of miRNAs in Cancer
Chapter number 6
Book title
Epigenetic Alterations in Oncogenesis
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9967-2_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4419-9966-5, 978-1-4419-9967-2
Authors

Muller Fabbri, Federica Calore, Alessio Paone, Roberta Galli, George A. Calin, Fabbri, Muller, Calore, Federica, Paone, Alessio, Galli, Roberta, Calin, George A.

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNAs with gene regulatory functions. It has been demonstrated that the genes encoding for miRNAs undergo the same regulatory epigenetic processes of protein coding genes. In turn, a specific subgroup of miRNAs, called epi-miRNAs, is able to directly target key enzymatic effectors of the epigenetic machinery (such as DNA methyltransferases, histone deacetylases, and polycomb genes), therefore indirectly affecting the expression of epigenetically regulated oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Also, several of the epigenetic drugs currently approved as anticancer agents affect the expression of miRNAs and this might explain part of their mechanism of action. This chapter focuses on the tight relationship between epigenetics and miRNAs and provides some insights on the translational implications of these findings, leading to the upcoming introduction of epigenetically related miRNAs in the treatment of cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 26%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,020,322
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,781
of 4,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,406
of 280,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#72
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.