↓ Skip to main content

Software Engineering and Formal Methods

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Software Engineering and Formal Methods'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Abstractions, Semantic Models and Analysis Tools for Concurrent Systems: Progress and Open Problems
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Satisfiability Checking: Theory and Applications
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Automatic Derivation of Platform Noninterference Properties
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Linearizability and Causality
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Refinement-Based Verification of Communicating Unstructured Code
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Guided Dynamic Symbolic Execution Using Subgraph Control-Flow Information
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Correlating Structured Inputs and Outputs in Functional Specifications
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Combining Predicate Abstraction with Fixpoint Approximations
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Finding Boundary Elements in Ordered Sets with Application to Safety and Requirements Analysis
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Combining Abstract Interpretation with Symbolic Execution for a Static Value Range Analysis of Block Diagrams
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Program Generation Using Simulated Annealing and Model Checking
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 LTL Parameter Synthesis of Parametric Timed Automata
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Model Checking Simulation Rules for Linearizability
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 LTL Model Checking under Fairness in ProB
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Counterexamples from Proof Failures in SPARK
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Proving Termination of Programs with Bitvector Arithmetic by Symbolic Execution
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 SMT-Based Automatic Proof of ASM Model Refinement
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Coq Implementation of OO Verification Framework VeriJ
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Towards a Proof Framework for Information Systems with Weak Consistency
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 A Cognitive Framework Based on Rewriting Logic for the Analysis of Interactive Systems
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Incentive Stackelberg Mean-Payoff Games
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Stability-Based Adaptation of Asynchronously Communicating Software
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Compliance Checking in the Open Payments Ecosystem
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 CoCoSpec: A Mode-Aware Contract Language for Reactive Systems
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Modularizing Crosscutting Concerns in Component-Based Systems
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Tightening a Contract Refinement
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 BMotionWeb: A Tool for Rapid Creation of Formal Prototypes
Attention for Chapter 21: Incentive Stackelberg Mean-Payoff Games
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Incentive Stackelberg Mean-Payoff Games
Chapter number 21
Book title
Software Engineering and Formal Methods
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41591-8_21
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-941590-1, 978-3-31-941591-8
Authors

Anshul Gupta, Sven Schewe, Ashutosh Trivedi, Maram Sai Krishna Deepak, Bharath Kumar Padarthi, Gupta, Anshul, Schewe, Sven, Trivedi, Ashutosh, Deepak, Maram Sai Krishna, Padarthi, Bharath Kumar

Editors

Rocco De Nicola, Eva Kühn

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 29%
Computer Science 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,379,760
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,649
of 8,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,125
of 352,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#176
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.