You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Fluid Registration Between Lung CT and Stationary Chest Tomosynthesis Images
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2020
arXiv, September 2020
Lin Tian, Connor Puett, Peirong Liu, Zhengyang Shen, Stephen R. Aylward, Yueh Z. Lee, Marc Niethammer, Tian, Lin, Puett, Connor, Liu, Peirong, Shen, Zhengyang, Aylward, Stephen R., Lee, Yueh Z., Niethammer, Marc
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||75%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||20%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
of 960,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 412,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
of 33,753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960,280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33,753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.