↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 17: Hypoxia
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hypoxia
Chapter number 17
Book title
Hypoxia
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7678-9_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4899-7676-5, 978-1-4899-7678-9
Authors

Hu, Jun, Bernardini, André, Fandrey, Joachim, Jun Hu, André Bernardini, Joachim Fandrey

Editors

Robert C. Roach, Peter H. Hackett, Peter D. Wagner

Abstract

Hypoxia is a common phenomenon that occurs in a variety of diseases such as cardiovascular ischemia, anemia, and cancer. Cellular oxygen sensors measure changes in tissue oxygenation and induce responses aimed at restoring sufficient supply with oxygen. Genetic adaptation to hypoxia is under control of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), of which two highly homologous subunits HIF-1α and HIF-2α are regulated by oxygen tension. Together with HIF-1β (=ARNT; aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator) they form transcriptionally active complexes under hypoxia which drive the expression of hypoxia inducible genes. The meaning of different HIF complexes, i.e., HIF-1α/ARNT versus HIF-2α/ARNT with respect to target gene or tissue specificity has not been fully resolved. We applied modern microscopic methods like fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to elucidate protein-protein interactions and fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching (FRAP) to study mobility of HIF proteins inside the nuclei of living cells. We found differences both in nuclear mobility and the assembly of HIF-1 versus HIF-2 which might help to better understand the assembly of HIF complexes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,972
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,840
of 352,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#91
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.