↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 28: Hypoxia
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hypoxia
Chapter number 28
Book title
Hypoxia
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7678-9_28
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4899-7676-5, 978-1-4899-7678-9
Authors

Grocott, Michael P W, Levett, D Z H, Martin, D S, Wilson, M H, Mackenney, A, Dhillon, S, Montgomery, H E, Mythen, M G, Mitchell, K, Michael P. W. Grocott, D. Z. H. Levett, D. S. Martin, M. H. Wilson, A. Mackenney, S. Dhillon, H. E. Montgomery, M. G. Mythen, K. Mitchell

Editors

Robert C. Roach, Peter H. Hackett, Peter D. Wagner

Abstract

The Caudwell Xtreme Everest (CXE) expedition in the spring of 2007 systematically studied 222 healthy volunteers as they ascended from sea level to Everest Base Camp (5300 m). A subgroup of climbing investigators ascended higher on Everest and obtained physiological measurements up to an altitude of 8400 m. The aim of the study was to explore inter-individual variation in response to environmental hypobaric hypoxia in order to understand better the pathophysiology of critically ill patients and other patients in whom hypoxaemia and cellular hypoxia are prevalent. This paper describes the aims, study characteristics, organization and management of the CXE expedition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Lecturer 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,379,002
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,507
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,893
of 352,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#41
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.