↓ Skip to main content

Medical Research and Innovation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 580: Serum Vitamin D and Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccination in the Elderly
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Serum Vitamin D and Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccination in the Elderly
Chapter number 580
Book title
Medical Research and Innovation
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2020
DOI 10.1007/5584_2020_580
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-070205-2, 978-3-03-070206-9
Authors

Sławin, Agata, Brydak, Lidia B, Doniec, Zbigniew, Bujnowska-Fedak, Maria, Mastalerz-Migas, Agnieszka, Agata Sławin, Lidia B. Brydak, Zbigniew Doniec, Maria Bujnowska-Fedak, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, Brydak, Lidia B.

Abstract

Vaccination is the most effective preventive measure that reduces the risk of influenza and post-influenza complications. It prevents influenza-related hospitalizations and deaths in 50-60% and about 80% of patients aged over 65, respectively. There is the clinical plausibility of the association between serum vitamin D (VIT D) content and viral respiratory infections. In this study, we addressed the issue of a vitamin D modulatory effect on the immune response to seasonal influenza vaccination in elderly persons. The study comprised 96 participants aged 60-75 during the 2016/17 epidemic season. After the determination of the baseline content of VIT D and anti-hemagglutinin antibodies (H1, H3, and HB), participants were vaccinated with a trivalent vaccine. The content of the anti-hemagglutinin antibodies was rechecked 4-5 weeks afterward, showing inappreciable alterations. The negative findings of this study make the influence of serum VIT D content on the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination highly unlikely in elderly persons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Psychology 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,279,905
of 23,485,953 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,085
of 4,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,496
of 409,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#52
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,953 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.