↓ Skip to main content

Medical Research and Innovation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 605: Manual Pressure Release and Low-Grade Electrical Peripheral Receptor Stimulation in Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Manual Pressure Release and Low-Grade Electrical Peripheral Receptor Stimulation in Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Chapter number 605
Book title
Medical Research and Innovation
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2021
DOI 10.1007/5584_2020_605
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-070205-2, 978-3-03-070206-9
Authors

Giovanni Barassi, Mieczyslaw Pokorski, Celeste Di Matteo, Marco Supplizi, Loris Prosperi, Vito Guglielmi, Alì Younes, Franco Della Rovere, Angelo Di Iorio, Barassi, Giovanni, Pokorski, Mieczyslaw, Matteo, Celeste Di, Supplizi, Marco, Prosperi, Loris, Guglielmi, Vito, Younes, Alì, Della Rovere, Franco, Iorio, Angelo Di

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 25 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 30 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,665,271
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,538
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,134
of 503,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#61
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.