You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Computational Toxicology
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 15 |
| Book title |
Computational Toxicology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-050-2_15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-049-6, 978-1-62703-050-2
|
| Authors |
Sandhya Kortagere, Matthew D. Krasowski, Sean Ekins |
| Editors |
Brad Reisfeld, Arthur N. Mayeno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,464,797
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,924
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,824
of 169,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#37
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.