You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Compartmental modeling in the analysis of biological systems.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 17 |
| Book title |
Computational Toxicology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-050-2_17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-049-6, 978-1-62703-050-2
|
| Authors |
Bassingthwaighte JB, Butterworth E, Jardine B, Raymond GM, James B. Bassingthwaighte, Erik Butterworth, Bartholomew Jardine, Gary M. Raymond |
| Editors |
Brad Reisfeld, Arthur N. Mayeno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,829
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,920
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,750
of 169,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#37
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.