↓ Skip to main content

Hox Genes

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Are the deuterostome posterior Hox genes a fast-evolving class?
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Are the deuterostome posterior Hox genes a fast-evolving class?
Chapter number 8
Book title
Hox Genes
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6673-5_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4419-6672-8, 978-1-4419-6673-5
Authors

Lanfear, Robert, Robert Lanfear

Editors

Jean S. Deutsch PhD

Abstract

There has been a great deal of interest in analysing the molecular evolution of the Hox cluster using both bioinformatic and experimental approaches. The posterior Hox genes have been of particular interest to both groups of biologists for a number of reasons: they appear to be associated with the evolution of a number of morphological novelties; the protostomes appear to be have lost a highly-conserved and functionally important amino acid motif (the hexapeptide motif) from their posterior Hox genes; and deuterostome posterior Hox genes seem to be evolving more quickly than all other Hox genes. In this chapter I will discuss the last of these points. The idea that Deuterostome posterior Hox genes were evolving more quickly than other Hox genes was first suggested by David Ferrier and colleagues. In this chapter, I start by introducing the posterior Hox genes--their distribution among the animal phyla and the likely sequence of duplications that led to this distribution. I then introduce the idea of 'deuterostome posterior flexibility' and examine this hypothesis in light of more recent phylogenetic and genomic work on the Hox cluster. Finally, I discuss some new approaches that could be used to test directly for differential rates of evolution among Hox genes and to assess what might underlie these differences.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Germany 1 10%
Australia 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%