↓ Skip to main content

Fungal Biofilms and related infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Aspergillus Biofilms in Human Disease
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Aspergillus Biofilms in Human Disease
Chapter number 4
Book title
Fungal Biofilms and related infections
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-942359-3, 978-3-31-942360-9
Authors

Williams, Craig, Rajendran, Ranjith, Ramage, Gordon, Craig Williams, Ranjith Rajendran, Gordon Ramage

Abstract

The biofilm phenotype of Aspergillus species is an important and accepted clinical entity. While industrially these biofilms have been used extensively in important biofermentations, their role in clinical infection is less well defined. A recent flurry of activity has demonstrated that these interesting filamentous moulds have the capacity to form biofilms both in vitro and in vivo, and through various investigations have shown that these are exquisitely resistant to antifungal therapies through a range of adaptive resistance mechanisms independent of defined genetic changes. This review will explore the clinical importance of these biofilms and provide contemporary information with respect to their clinical management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Unspecified 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Unspecified 4 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,462,696
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,316
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,647
of 341,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#91
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.