You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Tagging and Deleting of Endogenous Caveolar Components Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 14 |
Book title |
Caveolae
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-0732-9_14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160731-2, 978-1-07-160732-9
|
Authors |
Elena Shvets, Carolina Mendoza-Topaz, Shvets, Elena, Mendoza-Topaz, Carolina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
France | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#12,960,084
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,295
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,997
of 397,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#32
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.