You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
In Vivo Visualization of Moving Synaptic Cargo Complexes within Drosophila Larval Segmental Axons
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Axon Degeneration
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-0585-1_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160584-4, 978-1-07-160585-1
|
Authors |
Rupkatha Banerjee, Joseph A. White, Shermali Gunawardena, Banerjee, Rupkatha, White, Joseph A., Gunawardena, Shermali |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 50% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,599,491
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,175
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,572
of 459,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#16
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.