↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic mRNA

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Synthetic mRNA
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Synthetic mRNA
Chapter number 8
Book title
Synthetic mRNA
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3625-0_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3623-6, 978-1-4939-3625-0
Authors

Gardner, Christina L, Trobaugh, Derek W, Ryman, Kate D, Klimstra, William B, Christina L. Gardner, Derek W. Trobaugh, Kate D. Ryman, William B. Klimstra, Gardner, Christina L., Trobaugh, Derek W., Ryman, Kate D., Klimstra, William B.

Abstract

The ability to transfect synthetic mRNAs into cells to measure processes such as translation efficiency or mRNA decay has been an invaluable tool in cell biology. The use of electroporation over other methods of transfection is an easy, inexpensive, highly efficient, and scalable method to introduce synthetic mRNA into a wide range of cell types. More recently, coupling of noncoding RNA sequences or protein coding regions from viral pathogens to fluorescent or bioluminescence proteins in RNA "reporters" has permitted study of host-pathogen interactions. These can range from virus infection of cells to translation of the viral genome, replication and stability of viral RNAs, or the efficacy of host antiviral responses. In this chapter, we describe a method for electroporating viral RNA reporters into both fibroblastic and myeloid cells that encode firefly or Renilla luciferase, whose reaction with specific substrates and light emitting activity is a measure of viral RNA translation efficiency. We have used this method to examine host interferon-dependent responses that inhibit viral translation along with identifying secondary structures in the 5' nontranslated region (NTR) and microRNA binding sites in the 3' NTR that are responsible for antagonizing the host innate immune responses and restricting viral cell tropism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,330,976
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,917
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,728
of 393,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,054
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.