@latimeralder @lose_all_faith And what is the incentive of one academic peer reviewing another academic's paper? So that academic reviews their paper. And so it goes on. https://t.co/kD49VReMmt
@joshinthehouse3 @crabb_vicki @yeahnaa333 @stkirsch Lol I told you I posted the wrong ones at first, the others show there is groupthink and the studies that goes against the consensus tend to be rejected by the peer reviewers like this one https://t.co/zT
@crabb_vicki @yeahnaa333 @stkirsch I have that publisher are gate keeping, the peer reviewing, I don't cited the good paper, those was not about consensus and groupthink, here's some https://t.co/zTNPZGynIx https://t.co/tYJCyjWTlU
https://t.co/TzcIMQQZo1 "Studies have shown that various types of biases can impact scientific peer review. These biases may contribute to a type of groupthink that can make it difficult to obtain funding or publish innovative or controversial research. "