↓ Skip to main content

Forest-Water Interactions

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Forest-Water Interactions'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Cracking “Open” Technology in Ecohydrology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Necessity of Sensor Calibration for the Precise Measurement of Water Fluxes in Forest Ecosystems
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Applications of Unpiloted Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Forest Hydrology
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 LiDAR Applications to Forest-Water Interactions
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 On Complementing the Tracer Toolbox for Quantifying Hydrological Connectivity: Insights Gained from Terrestrial Diatom Tracer Experiments
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Lessons in New Measurement Technologies: From Instrumenting Trees to the Trans-African Hydrometeorological Observatory
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Primary Steps in Analyzing Data: Tasks and Tools for a Systematic Data Exploration
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Spatiotemporal Statistics: Analysis of Spatially and Temporally Correlated Throughfall Data: Exploring and Considering Dependency and Heterogeneity
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Analysis of Vegetation-Water Interactions: Application and Comparison of Maximum-Likelihood Estimation and Bayesian Inference
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Machine Learning Applications in Hydrology
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Advances and Future Research Directions in the Study of Leaf Water Repellency
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Throughfall Erosivity in Relation to Drop Size and Crown Position: A Case Study from a Teak Plantation in Thailand
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Assessing the Ecological Significance of Throughfall in Forest Ecosystems
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Root-Water Relations and Interactions in Mixed Forest Settings
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Effects of Stemflow on Soil Water Dynamics in Forest Stands
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Radiocesium Cycling in the Context of Forest-Water Interactions
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Urban Trees as Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Mitigation and Use
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Urban Tree Canopy Effects on Water Quality via Inputs to the Urban Ground Surface
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Modeling the Impact of Urban Trees on Hydrology
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Using Community Planning to Conserve Green Infrastructure and Water Quality
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Forest Influences on Streamflow: Case Studies from the Tatsunokuchi-Yama Experimental Watershed, Japan, and the Leading Ridge Experimental Watershed, USA
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 The Biogeochemical Response of Nitrate and Potassium to Landscape Disturbance in Watersheds of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Water and Nutrient Budgets of Organic Layers and Mineral Topsoils Under Tropical Montane Forest in Ecuador in Response to 15 Years of Environmental Change
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Forest-Water Interactions Under Global Change
Attention for Chapter 19: Modeling the Impact of Urban Trees on Hydrology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Modeling the Impact of Urban Trees on Hydrology
Chapter number 19
Book title
Forest-Water Interactions
Published by
US Forest Service, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-26086-6_19
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-026085-9, 978-3-03-026086-6
Authors

Coville, Robert, Endreny, Ted, Nowak, David J., R​obert, Coville

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 18%
Engineering 4 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,598,026
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from this source
#1,093
of 1,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,845
of 457,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#66
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.