↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Participation

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Electronic Participation'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Towards a Systematic Exploitation of Web 2.0 and Simulation Modeling Tools in Public Policy Process
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Don’t Vote, Evolve!
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Use of Expressives in Online Political Talk: Impeding or Facilitating the Normative Goals of Deliberation?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 ICT’s for Democracy in Latin America?
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 eParticipation Initiatives in Europe: Learning from Practitioners
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Tracking and Explaining E-Participation in India
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 e-Participation Experiences and Local Government in Catalonia: An Explanatory Analysis
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The AUGMENT Project: Co-constructive Mapping and Support of Accessibility and Participation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genres of Participation in Social Networking Systems: A Study of the 2009 Norwegian Parliamentary Election
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Political Deliberation in the Blogosphere: The Case of the 2009 Portuguese Elections
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 On Sustainable eParticipation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Widening the Disciplinary Scope of eParticipation. Reflections after a Research on Tourism and Cultural Heritage
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Survey on Participation at Geneva’s Constituent Assembly
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Regional Model for E-Participation in the EU: Evaluation and Lessons Learned from VoicE
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Service Guidelines of Public Meeting’s Webcasts: An Experience
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Semantic Web Standards and Ontologies for Legislative Drafting Support
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Using Gis Tools to Support E_Participation – A Systematic Evaluation
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Do Voting Advice Applications Have an Effect on Electoral Participation and Voter Turnout? Evidence from the 2007 Swiss Federal Elections
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 An Integrated Application of Security Testing Methodologies to e-voting Systems
Attention for Chapter 18: Do Voting Advice Applications Have an Effect on Electoral Participation and Voter Turnout? Evidence from the 2007 Swiss Federal Elections
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Do Voting Advice Applications Have an Effect on Electoral Participation and Voter Turnout? Evidence from the 2007 Swiss Federal Elections
Chapter number 18
Book title
Electronic Participation
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-15158-3_18
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-215157-6, 978-3-64-215158-3
Authors

Andreas Ladner, Joëlle Pianzola

Editors

Efthimios Tambouris, Ann Macintosh, Olivier Glassey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 242 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 14%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 23 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 69 27%
Social Sciences 61 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 40 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Decision Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 47 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,887,122
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#918
of 8,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,792
of 93,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.