↓ Skip to main content

Innate DNA and RNA Recognition

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Innate DNA and RNA Recognition'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Detection of RNA modifications by HPLC analysis and competitive ELISA.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Enzymatic Synthesis and Purification of a Defined RIG-I Ligand.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Crystallization of Mouse RIG-I ATPase Domain: In Situ Proteolysis.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Isolation of RIG-I-Associated RNAs from Virus-Infected Cells.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Structure modeling of toll-like receptors.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Nucleic Acid recognition in dendritic cells.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Viral nucleic Acid recognition in human nonimmune cells: in vitro systems.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analysis of nucleic Acid-induced nonimmune cell death in vitro.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 In vitro analysis of nucleic Acid recognition in B lymphocytes.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Mapping of optimal CD8 T cell epitopes.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Modular Approach to Suppression Assays: TLR Ligands, Conditioned Medium, and Viral Infection.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 MicroRNA Methodology: Advances in miRNA Technologies.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Expression Profiling by Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Evaluating the role of nucleic Acid antigens in murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Induction and analysis of nephrotoxic serum nephritis in mice.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation of Intratumoral Leukocytes of TLR-Stimulated Tumor-Bearing Mice.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Bifunctional siRNAs for Tumor Therapy.
Attention for Chapter 6: Nucleic Acid recognition in dendritic cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nucleic Acid recognition in dendritic cells.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Innate DNA and RNA Recognition
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0882-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0881-3, 978-1-4939-0882-0
Authors

Heiseke A, Eisenächer K, Krug A, Alexander Heiseke, Katharina Eisenächer, Anne Krug M.D., Anne Krug

Editors

Hans-Joachim Anders, Adriana Migliorini

Abstract

The immune system consists of specialized cell types with distinct functions in order to provide an effective innate and adaptive immune defense against harmful invading pathogens like bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites, or other substances threatening the integrity of the organism. Once the immune system recognizes such pathogens via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), they are taken up, processed, and presented as antigens on MHC class I and II to T lymphocytes by specialized cells called dendritic cells (DCs). At the same time pathogen components which bind to PRRs in DCs trigger potent cytokine and chemokine responses. Although other cell types like macrophages can also take up, process, and present antigens to naïve T lymphocytes, DCs are the cells with the greatest capacity to do so. Thus, DCs are also called professional antigen presenting cells (APCs), which induce a strong adaptive immune response and thereby act as a bridge between the innate and adaptive immune system.This chapter provides detailed instructions on how to generate various types of DCs from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and murine bone marrow, as well as stimulation conditions for activation of these cells by PRR ligands in vitro.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 43%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,782,026
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,672
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,851
of 226,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#25
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.