You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Counterfactual Thinking in Cooperation Dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology
|
| Published in |
arXiv, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-32722-4_5 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-032721-7, 978-3-03-032722-4
|
| Authors |
Luís Moniz Pereira, Francisco C. Santos, Luis Moniz Pereira, Pereira, Luís Moniz, Santos, Francisco C. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Portugal | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 36% |
| Professor | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 36% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Psychology | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,551,696
of 23,858,780 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#204,501
of 993,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,493
of 363,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#7,057
of 29,278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,858,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29,278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.