You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Improving Editorial Workflow and Metadata Quality at Springer Nature
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 31 |
Book title |
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019
|
Published in |
arXiv, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_31 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-030795-0, 978-3-03-030796-7
|
Authors |
Angelo A. Salatino, Francesco Osborne, Aliaksandr Birukou, Enrico Motta, Salatino, Angelo, Osborne, Francesco, Birukou, Aliaksandr, Motta, Enrico, Salatino, Angelo A. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 8 | 47% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 12% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,352,323
of 23,493,900 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#40,637
of 971,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,125
of 363,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#1,344
of 29,374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,493,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 971,276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29,374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.