↓ Skip to main content

Convective and radiative heat transfer coefficients for individual human body segments

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Convective and radiative heat transfer coefficients for individual human body segments
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, May 1997
DOI 10.1007/s004840050035
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. J. de Dear, Edward Arens, Zhang Hui, Masayuki Oguro

Abstract

Human thermal physiological and comfort models will soon be able to simulate both transient and spatial inhomogeneities in the thermal environment. With this increasing detail comes the need for anatomically specific convective and radiative heat transfer coefficients for the human body. The present study used an articulated thermal manikin with 16 body segments (head, chest, back, upper arms, forearms, hands, pelvis, upper legs, lower legs, feet) to generate radiative heat transfer coefficients as well as natural- and forced-mode convective coefficients. The tests were conducted across a range of wind speeds from still air to 5.0 m/s, representing atmospheric conditions typical of both indoors and outdoors. Both standing and seated postures were investigated, as were eight different wind azimuth angles. The radiative heat transfer coefficient measured for the whole-body was 4.5 W/m2 per K for both the seated and standing cases, closely matching the generally accepted whole-body value of 4.7 W/m2 per K. Similarly, the whole-body natural convection coefficient for the manikin fell within the mid-range of previously published values at 3.4 and 3.3 W/m2 per K when standing and seated respectively. In the forced convective regime, heat transfer coefficients were higher for hands, feet and peripheral limbs compared to the central torso region. Wind direction had little effect on convective heat transfers from individual body segments. A general-purpose forced convection equation suitable for application to both seated and standing postures indoors was hc = 10.3v0.6 for the whole-body. Similar equations were generated for individual body segments in both seated and standing postures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 277 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 21%
Student > Master 52 18%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 116 40%
Environmental Science 16 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 89 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#745
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,549
of 29,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.