You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Globally Guided Progressive Fusion Network for 3D Pancreas Segmentation
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 24 |
Book title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019
|
Published in |
arXiv, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_24 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-032244-1, 978-3-03-032245-8
|
Authors |
Chaowei Fang, Guanbin Li, Chengwei Pan, Yiming Li, Yizhou Yu, Fang, Chaowei, Li, Guanbin, Pan, Chengwei, Li, Yiming, Yu, Yizhou |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 7 | 37% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,693,088
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#542,675
of 953,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,936
of 354,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#17,025
of 29,312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953,683 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29,312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.