↓ Skip to main content

Preparation and Application of Electrodes in Capacitive Deionization (CDI): a State-of-Art Review

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preparation and Application of Electrodes in Capacitive Deionization (CDI): a State-of-Art Review
Published in
Discover Nano, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s11671-016-1284-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baoping Jia, Wei Zhang

Abstract

As a promising desalination technology, capacitive deionization (CDI) have shown practicality and cost-effectiveness in brackish water treatment. Developing more efficient electrode materials is the key to improving salt removal performance. This work reviewed current progress on electrode fabrication in application of CDI. Fundamental principal (e.g. EDL theory and adsorption isotherms) and process factors (e.g. pore distribution, potential, salt type and concentration) of CDI performance were presented first. It was then followed by in-depth discussion and comparison on properties and fabrication technique of different electrodes, including carbon aerogel, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, graphene and ordered mesoporous carbon. Finally, polyaniline as conductive polymer and its potential application as CDI electrode-enhancing materials were also discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 267 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 20%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 60 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 45 17%
Chemical Engineering 43 16%
Engineering 38 14%
Materials Science 26 10%
Environmental Science 23 8%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 68 25%