You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polymer Drugs in the Clinical Stage
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/b105364 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-306-47471-2, 978-0-306-47932-8
|
| Editors |
Hiroshi Maeda, Alexander Kabanov, Kazunori Kataoka, Teruo Okano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 300% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 200% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,478,082
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,231
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,552
of 129,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.