↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Immunology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: In Vitro Generation of Antigen-Specific T Cells from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells of Antigen-Specific T Cell Origin.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In Vitro Generation of Antigen-Specific T Cells from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells of Antigen-Specific T Cell Origin.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Tumor Immunology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3338-9_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3336-5, 978-1-4939-3338-9
Authors

Shin Kaneko, Kaneko, Shin

Editors

Attilio Bondanza, Monica Casucci

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells derived from T lymphocyte (T-iPS cells) preserve the T cell receptor (TCR) α and β gene rearrangements identical to the original T cell clone. Re-differentiated CD8 single positive αβ T cells from the T-iPS cells exhibited antigen-specific cytotoxicity, improved proliferative response, and elongation of telomere indicating rejuvenation of antigen specific T cell immunity in vitro. To regenerate antigen specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), first, we have optimized a method for reprogramming-resistant CD8 T cell clones into T-iPS cells by using sendaiviral vectors. Second, we have optimized stepwise differentiation methods for inducing hematopoietic progenitor cells, T cell progenitors, and functionally matured CD8 single positive CTL. These protocols provide useful in vitro tools and models both for research of antigen-specific T cell immunotherapy and for research of normal and pathological thymopoiesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 39%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,740,179
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,421
of 13,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,941
of 396,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#272
of 1,472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.