↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Immunology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Tumor Immunology
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tumor Immunology
Chapter number 3
Book title
Tumor Immunology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3338-9_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3336-5, 978-1-4939-3338-9
Authors

Smits, Evelien L J M, Stein, Barbara, Nijs, Griet, Lion, Eva, Van Tendeloo, Viggo F, Willemen, Yannick, Anguille, Sébastien, Berneman, Zwi N, Evelien L. J. M. Smits, Barbara Stein, Griet Nijs, Eva Lion, Viggo F. Van Tendeloo, Yannick Willemen, Sébastien Anguille, Zwi N. Berneman, Smits, Evelien L. J. M., Van Tendeloo, Viggo F., Berneman, Zwi N.

Editors

Attilio Bondanza, Monica Casucci

Abstract

First described in the 1970s, dendritic cells (DC) are currently subjects of intense investigation to exploit their unique antigen-presenting and immunoregulatory capacities. In cancer, DC show promise to elicit or amplify immune responses directed against cancer cells by activating natural killer (NK) cells and tumor antigen-specific T cells. Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) protein is a tumor-associated antigen that is expressed in a majority of cancer types and has been designated as an antigen of major interest to be targeted in clinical cancer immunotherapy trials. In this chapter, we describe the generation, cryopreservation, and thawing of clinical grade autologous monocyte-derived DC vaccines that are loaded with WT1 by messenger RNA (mRNA) electroporation. This in-house-developed transfection method gives rise to presentation of multiple antigen epitopes and can be used for all patients without restriction of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Researcher 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Psychology 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,317,110
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,916
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,693
of 393,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,053
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.