↓ Skip to main content

B Cell Receptor Signaling

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 477: B Cell Receptor Signaling
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
B Cell Receptor Signaling
Chapter number 477
Book title
B Cell Receptor Signaling
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/82_2015_477
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-926131-7, 978-3-31-926133-1
Authors

Baba, Yoshihiro, Kurosaki, Tomohiro, Yoshihiro Baba, Tomohiro Kurosaki

Abstract

Increase in intracellular levels of calcium ions (Ca(2+)) is one of the key triggering signals for the development of B cell response to the antigen. The diverse Ca(2+) signals finely controlled by multiple factors participate in the regulation of gene expression, B cell development, and effector functions. B cell receptor (BCR)-initiated Ca(2+) mobilization is sourced from two pathways: one is the release of Ca(2+) from the intracellular stores, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and other is the prolonged influx of extracellular Ca(2+) induced by depleting the stores via store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) and calcium release-activated calcium (CRAC) channels. The identification of stromal interaction molecule 1(STIM1 ), the ER Ca(2+) sensor, and Orai1 , a key subunit of the CRAC channel pore, has now provided the tools to understand the mode of Ca(2+) influx regulation and physiological relevance. Herein, we discuss our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying BCR-triggered Ca(2+) signaling as well as its contribution to the B cell biological processes and diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,477,524
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#199
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,110
of 268,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.