↓ Skip to main content

Marine Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 13: Marine Genomics
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Marine Genomics
Chapter number 13
Book title
Marine Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3774-5_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3772-1, 978-1-4939-3774-5
Authors

Bourlat, Sarah J, Haenel, Quiterie, Finnman, Jennie, Leray, Matthieu, Sarah J. Bourlat, Quiterie Haenel, Jennie Finnman, Matthieu Leray

Editors

Sarah J. Bourlat

Abstract

This protocol details the preparation of multiplexed amplicon libraries for metabarcoding (amplicon-based) studies of microscopic marine eukaryotes. Metabarcoding studies, based on the amplification of a taxonomically informative marker from a collection of organisms or an environmental sample, can be performed to analyze biodiversity patterns or predator-prey interactions. For Metazoa, we use the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) or the small ribosomal subunit (SSU) markers. Here, we describe a strategy for the preparation of multiplexed Illumina MiSeq libraries using a dual-PCR approach for the addition of index and adaptor sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 30%
Environmental Science 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,240,961
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,468
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,723
of 393,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#328
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.