You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Exposure of the dorsal root ganglion to pulsed radiofrequency current in a neuropathic pain model of peripheral nerve injury.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 21 |
| Book title |
Pain Research
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-561-9_21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-560-2, 978-1-61779-561-9
|
| Authors |
Danielle Perret, Doo-Sik Kim, Kang-Wu Li, Z. David Luo |
| Abstract |
The spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in rats, as originally described by Kim and Chung (Pain 50:355-363, 1992), provides an excellent venue to study the antinociception and modulation effects of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) current in pain processing. We describe the procedure of application of PRF current near the exposed L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in rats with L5 spinal nerve ligation injury-induced behavioral hypersensitivity. This method employs the direct visualization of the L5 DRG, allowing for confirmation of the location of the PRF probe adjacent to the DRG. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,811
of 13,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,921
of 244,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#325
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.